Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

geforce-gtx-780-vs-radeon-r9-290xNvidia GeForce GTX 780

This particular graphics card is designed for the most demanding users and gamers. It offers excellent performance in Full HD resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels or higher. This card has increased slightly the timing of its core compared to the reference model. There is of course the possibility of overclocking its frequency. Draws attention as one of the top high-end video cards, lots of attention to detail, as well as its cooling system that works quietly and efficiently. Price for the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 is around $600, but its justifies its capabilities.

Pros

Superior performance at 1920 x 1080 and 2560 x 1600,  quiet and efficient cooling system, quality workmanship, excellent overclocking capabilities
nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

AMD Radeon R9 290X

The AMD Radeon R9 290X is a great video card for gamers and those looking for a good performance at resolutions higher than Full HD. This video card CSC has a tweaked engine and 512-bit memory interface and a lot more complex architecture in relation to the R9 280x model. For this reason, its core comprises up to 6.2 billion transistors and uses AMD TrueAudio sound system.

Pros
Great performance; Better performance than: GeForce GTX 780; Technologies: TrueAudio, automatic configuration UltraHD 4K displays, Mantle, Uber and Quiet modes; Good Price

Cons
High working temperature; Very high power consumption; Very loud fan

AMD Radeon R9 290X

Looks like the AMD Radeon R9 290X edges out the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 by a little bit.

[wptg_comparison_table id=”1″]

Gaming performance

[wptg_comparison_table id="2"]

Score after 3D Mark 11 is completed and returns the value determined as a result.

[wptg_comparison_table id="3"]

The result is the average of the measured number of frames per second at a resolution of 1920 x 1080, the maximum level details and settings 2TX and AF x16.

[wptg_comparison_table id="4"]

The result is the average of the measured number of frames per second at a resolution of 1920 x 1080, the highest level of detail and x2 SSAA settings and AF x16.

[wptg_comparison_table id="5"]

The result is the average of the measured number of frames per second at a resolution of 1920 x 1080, the highest level of detail and FXAA and AF settings, x16, and TressFX on.

Share this post